Confucius and Plato

Confucius and Plato Editor survey Wolf, at the beginning of the essay Confucius and Plato A Few Really grievous People, poses the question What is the best way to create a strong monastic instal? (Wolf 25) It was surprising to a novice student of philosophy how similar the ideas of the quaint Chinese sage Confucius and famous Greek philosopher Plato were. Although, Confucius and Plato both(prenominal) made study contri exceptions to the development of society, they showed both similarities and differences in these three subjects judgment class, education, and opinion in military personnel.Confucius and Plato both believed virtue and intelligence were key components to creating a strong society. Confucius ideal anyone who has been educated had the capability to develop into a ruler. Whereas Plato assumed anyone could be educated, but only a few, those in the ruling class had the ability to causa and thus were qualified to rule. In addition, Plato gave credence to the ide a of being innate(p) into the ruling class, that the quality to reason was an inherited quality. Confucius and Plato were both strong believers that order was a nonher main factor in a strong society.Although they both had laws to maintain the order, Plato had less faith in tidy sum in widely distributed to behave in a civilized manner. Both Confucius and Plato were in regard of education and were teachers themselves. Confuciuss followers were the ones who wrote the Analects, which talked about how civilization depends on humanity and propriety. Plato actually wrote The Republic which talked about his ideal philosopher-king. Plato established the Academy, which taught principles of ethical motive and government, for 900 years. Confucius attempted to teach the ruler to become a better person, but failed.The concepts put forth by Confucius and Plato begin to differ more when faith in humanity comes into play. Confucius and Plato both wanted to think there was technical in everyone , but Confucius believed more in a society in which human relationshipsespecially those within the familywere more important than laws. (Wolf 27) Plato concluded that the great deal needed to be controlled for there to be order. That control was maintained through and through the law. They both sought out peace and harmony, although Confucius focused more on the behavior of individuals and Plato was interested in universal truth even though it probably would not be accepted,.Plato felt that if a person essay to bring enlightenment to the masses they would probably try to kill to him for tattle such tall tales, disrupting their lives and challenging their accustomed beliefs. (Wolf 31) Even today, most people would agree with Confucius and Plato about the importance of educating people in the development of a strong society. The idea of relationships as the basis of society may be summed up in Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This well-disposed Rule seems to be as important to Western society as it was to Chinese society. However, the idea of a better quality of citizen that is better conform to to lead society smacks of elitism and would definitely not be accepted in modern democracies. However, that does not mean that the elite educated class from Harvard and Yale has not been overrepresented in American leadership. So perhaps we have a ruling elite, but not as overt as Plato would like. A net thought from the essay would be a harmonious and orderly mankind is important to all societies.