'Changing Behavior Case Study Analysis Essay\r'

'A customer approached me because he has a serious problem with dilatoriness. My node has procrastinated close moldivities that were not comfortable or enjoyable for as far fanny as he bed remember. Procrastinated activities hold but are not modified to digesting agitates, doing homework assignments, making keep on assigned projects in the withdrawice, buy presents for birthdays or holidays and scheduling just close to anything. Due to this undesirable fashion my lymph gland has lost a few jobs, failed come forth of school and is behind on his mortgage. Of on the whole of these activities my guest would like assistance with dilatoriness as it relates to give(a) bills since that seems to be the most pressing issue. It should be noted that the procrastination has increased in frequency since nestlinghood. My customer blames this manner for the extraordinary amount of try on in his life.\r\n incorrupt Conditioning:\r\nClassical Conditioning could be a originati on of my node’s procrastination. In virtuous learn an un well-read excitant is disc everyplaceed to create an unconditioned reaction. If a conditioned remark is paired with an unconditioned arousal then stilltually the conditioned stimulant leave also evoke the alike response as the unconditioned stimulant. The response to a conditioned stimulation is called a conditioned response. (Morris, C., & adenosine monophosphate; Maisto, 2013) In my client’s boldness the unconditioned stimulus was pay bills with the family as a child. specie was tight in his family and the lack of coin caused many reasons. The arguments resulted in very disagreeable situations that my client wanted to vacate. To put this in terms of true condition, the unconditioned stimulus was the lack of money. The unconditioned response was an argument that caused straining that my client tried to neutralise. Since the arguments over money happened primarily when it was judgment of c onviction to pay bills the conditioned stimulus became remunerative off bills. The conditioned response was to avoid the emphasis caused by paying bills by procrastinating.\r\nThe recurrent pairing of the stress from arguing spell paying bills strengthened the desire to avoid the situation resulting in the habitual fashion problem of procrastination. Had the stress from arguing occurred still occasionally over bills, also cognize as intermittent pairing (Morris, C., & angstrom unit; Maisto, 2013), then it may hand over got been little likely that my client would procrastinate his bill paying. In this scenario you could compare my client’s procrastination with the results from Pavlov’s experiment with his dogs. Pavlov’s experiment measured how much his dogs would act reflexively when food was introduced. The food and salivation were the unconditioned stimulus and unconditioned response respectively. Pavlov also rang a bell individually magazine he fe d the dogs. After some time Pavlov noticed that his dogs would salivate when the bell rang even if there was no food present. In this way the bell became the conditioned stimulus that elicited the conditioned response of the dogs salivating. (Morris, C., & Maisto, 2013)\r\nOperant Conditioning:\r\nIf we look at my client’s demeanor from the survey of operative conditioning then we have to determine if there were reinforcers or punishers that stirred the desired, or undesired, bearing. To explain how operant conditioning could cause procrastination we first take on to define reinforcers and punishers. In Operant conditioning a reinforcer is some relegate of stimulus that is introduced after the desired behavior that encourages the behavior. A punisher on the other ease up is a stimulus that is introduced after the behavior in rewrite to discourage the behavior. Thorndike’s Law of Effect states that behavior that is rewarded frequently will be â€Å"stampe d in” and that behavior that causes some sort of discomfort will be â€Å"stamped out”. (Morris, C., & Maisto, 2013)\r\n utilize the same example we used for classical conditioning, we will discuss my client’s undesired behavior of procrastinating bill payments utilize an operant conditioning scenario. In this case paying bills was the behavior. The punisher was the yelling and arguing that caused the timber of stress. Due to continued exposure to the â€Å"stress of paying bills” my client developed an plague to paying them. Thus his procrastination could be considered an operant behavior. This is backed up by Thorndike’s Law of Effect as stated above. (Morris, C., & Maisto, 2013)\r\nCognitive and favorable Learning Theories:\r\nThe social learning theories can be applied to my client’s undesired behavior of procrastination and in my opinion may cause to a greater extent sense than the other two theories of operant and classical conditioning. As a child my client was exposed to the stress caused by lack of money that my client cerebrate to bills. My client learned the behavior that bills were not fun to pay and should be avoided at an early age. This is a blend of cognitive and social learning. My client did not win that he had learned to avoid paying bills. This is an example of latent learning since the behavior was learned but had not been present yet. Edward Chace Tolman was a pioneer in cognitive learning theories who theorized that learning does not have to be observable in order for it to have occurred. (Morris, C., & Maisto, 2013). The effect of the tart bill paying experiences was observed from the actions of the parents. My client was not actually paying bills as a child so the behavior was observer, or learned vicariously, from the parents as they remunerative bills. Specifically my client observed a vicarious punishment for the act of paying bills which resulted in a desire to avoid th e stress involved in paying bills. This latent behavior manifested later in life as procrastination.\r\nRecommendation:\r\n magic spell there are options available with each theory discussed above I would suggest an operant conditioning solution for my client. A reinforcer could be added to the bill paying process in order to make the behavior of paying bills on time more harming. The reward would need to be practical but significant comely to overcome the anticipated stress that my client associates with paying bills. Over time the act of paying bills will be associated with pleasant results rather than the stress of his childhood. Thorndike would probably hypothesise this behavior is â€Å"Stamped In” to my client erstwhile we are finished with the conditioning.\r\nReferences\r\nMorris, C., & Maisto, A. (2013). sagaciousness psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.\r\n'