Thursday, October 10, 2019
Relationship Between Satisfaction with Life To Social Network Size Essay
Abstract     The dilemma in society are how to pursue pleasure or a source of happiness. The effect that society has on a individual leaves them oblivious to the source of gratitude. Simple acts of kindness are akin to the source of what people find most important. The data that was used to answers the personal questions that were designed to determine the statistical source of the personality type. The attributes of a personality type that contribute to the situation are statistically proven. The personality types that become involved with others individuals find themselves in a similar situation. The relevance of the importance topic pertains to the effect on the individuals and those that they involve. The information will help develop the future behavior that is attributed to kindness. Research that could have an effect on the ability to continue with the conscious habits of appreciation. The natural tendencies of people as they seek satisfaction in life should always be aware of how their surroundings affect their neighbors. Statement     The personality types that are inclined to be involved in efforts that are for the greater good. The studies that have tract the ability of a mind and its efforts to involve the humanitarian efforts through conscious efforts or non- conscious habits. The ideology that is strived for as the various mindsets that are guided in the practicality of gratitude, in every facet of existence. There are different mindset that are attributed to their expected outcome of a situation. It has been studied that there are few rational that can explain the motivations of an individual.     Every individual can be categorized as their physical descriptions eliminate the possibilities. The methods that are used to determine the psychological profile of the individual also is categorically determined. The determination of the personality types is commonly referred to as the Big Five. This offer the determination of the extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. These characteristics that are used to determine the tendencies of an individual are often seen in their persona or attitude. Every individual was aware of their participation and the data that was to be collected.     The research that has been accumulated has a further understanding of the motivation that allows others to be assisted by their physical determinations. The further science can be explained as to the reasons of or what creates gratitude, the quicker a mind can be assisted in realizing another perspective. At the conclusion of a study the participants were realizing that their behaviors were measured only for data; however, the conscious decision to include this new behavior in their own life is a personal choice. Introduction     The objectives that have been stated throughout the research was to determine the reasons for gratitude and the motivation that leads one to involve it in their lifestyle. A publication by Health Psychology was used to determine the scale of dispositional optimism. The efforts that are needed in society can be developed by having the conscious mindset that is conducive to the philanthropic contribution. Those that seek the emotional effect that it has on their life is directly linked to the gratitude that they exhort in common situations. The recent efforts to examine the problems that are linked to the lack of social awareness or concerns that are a direct correlation to the efforts of any individual.     The triangulation of the tendencies that are to be a desired behavior in society and its resulting actions. The surveys that was conducted in 1985, pertained to life’s orientation of how it was used to determine the optimism and expectancy.(SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985) Questionnaire was regularly handed out in efforts to ascertain the need of self consciousness. The health concerns that related to the survey were between the related theories and the orientation of the scale. The different tests have been previously designed by other psychologists. The most important test was the designed by Saucer. It is used to determine the psychological scale known as the Big 5. It categorizes the personality types such as extrovert or introverts and their interactions. This enabled the team of Belk and Richin to use their materialism tests to determine the scale. The Belk version is used to measure the pro-sociality and the levels of gratitude.  It assists in determining the life satisfaction, envy, perspective- taking, and spiritual transcendence.     Similar in design; however, the Richin material test is used calculate the success and happiness. McCollogh published an article in 2001 that proposed several directions for future research on gratitude that included psychometrics. The effect of gratitude has motivated the returning of the act. It presented several issues that had to be answered. Others that contributed to the research were P.C. Ellsworht and C.A. Smith. The article- Shades of Joy: Patterns of Appraisal- differentiate pleasant emotions shared in their research that the adjective of loving, grateful, friendly, and admirer had a structure that was a trifold cluster of the satisfaction of the senses.     The remaining data that had to be contributed was primarily used to support the research that already been completed. Butler’s research, 3 studies in 4 years, were all pertaining to the structural equation stated that the one factor solution for the six retaining items were assessed. It was used to determine the statistics of processing that information in a standardized square. Increasing the likelihood of finding the adequate parameters. Those various tests were designed to determine the accurate measurement. The variable tests that are used to compile the data. Thus the information that has been processed through those test is accurate enough to determine the weaknesses.     The concerning that are the three psychological domains are : 1) emotional as the primary concern is the well being 2)social interaction  3)spirituality and religion , all of these have a direct influence into the development of gratitude. (McCullough et al., 4)     Those that involve themselves have a mentality more empathetic, forgiving, helpful, and supportive. All those characteristics are trademarks of a productive individual or a conducive environment. The emotions that one feels is often due to the requirement of those that the individual surrounds themselves. The people that are noticed by their gaps in their emotional well being are those that need to be aware of their social and spiritual priorities. According Emmons and Tsung, the trait that are classified by the Big Five (John, Donahue, & Kentle, 1991) can be categorized as an individual that is grateful as more extraverted, more agreeable, and less neurotic.     The gratefulness as the generic term is applied to many aspects of the mind. Emotions, disposition, and attributes of an individual all contribute to the person’s willingness or non-conscious efforts in what is considered volunteer work. The compassion that is conducive to many of the situations that are needed for others to appreciate what is accomplished. The premise or higher ideology is considered spiritual. Methods          Those that were involved in developing the study were following the guidelines that are designed to keep the data resources non bias. The participants were 91 students, 23 male (25.3%), 68 female (74.7%) enrolled in Research Method in Psychology class at the California State University, Fullerton. The demographics were reflective of the populous and the involvement was voluntary. These participants range from 19 years old to 46 years old. The demographics are categorized in the Table 1. The second study involved 1228 adult volunteers. The majority were women and almost 90% were Caucasian. All of these participants were involved with spirituality and health.      To conduct this research participants were ask to complete a questionnaire, which was used to determine demographics and how it affected the tests, PANAS (Watson, Clark, Tellegen), Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky, Lepper), Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, Griffin), Gratitude questionnaire (McCullough, Emmons), Tendency to Forgive Scale (Brown), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg), Life Orientation Test (Scheier), Lubben Social Network Scale (Lubben) and Big Five Inventory Scale (John, Donahue, Kentle). Each participant received a questionnaire that had a description of the study and instructions. The participants were asked to provide some cursory information indicating their gender, age, level of education, and language preference. The PANAS was designed so that the individuals words would describe their different feelings and emotions. The participants were asked to indicate to what extent they have felt each feeling or emotion listed in the past two weeks at the time of the survey. A scale of 1-5 (very slightly or not at all, a little, moderately, quite a bit, extremely) was used to record their answers. The Subjective Happiness and Satisfaction Life Scale consists of questions to rate how happy the participants perceive themselves to be on a sliding scale.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is a measure of life’s satisfactions and how they developed by Ed Diener and colleagues (Diener, Emmons, Larsen & Griffin, 1985). Life satisfaction is one factor that is more of a general construct than a subject that pertains to well being. Theory and research from fields outside of rehabilitation have suggested that subjective well being has at least three components, positive affective appraisal, negative affective appraisal, and life satisfaction. Life satisfaction is distinguished from affective appraisal in that it is more cognitively than emotionally driven. Life satisfaction can be assessed specific to a particular domain of life or globally. The SWLS is a global measure of life satisfaction (Corrigan, 2000). The Life Orientation Test rates how optimistic or pessimistic the participants are in the Lubben social networking which consists of similarly designed questions that involved all aspects of the individuals life. The importance of social ties in the lives of older people has becoming increasingly recognized as strong associations have been consistently found between social support networks for physical and mental health. The Big Five inventory consists of a number of characteristics that may or may not apply to participants. (McCullough et al, 5) The participants were asked to rate the applicability of each characteristic to themselves in a scale of 1-5. The factors are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (OCEAN) or from the Five Factor Model (FFM). This consists of the following 5 factors: urgency, agreeableness, dependability, emotional stability, and culture. Each factor consists of a number of more specific traits. For example, extraversion includes such related qualities as sociability, excitement seeking, and positive emotions.     Questionnaires were handed out to all participants in the classroom of research method in psychology at the California State University, Fullerton. Participants were given instructions as a group and were told that participation in this study would be anonymous. It was also stated that they may choose to participate and could withdraw at anytime. The whole session took about 15-30 minutes. Participants were provided informed consent and debriefing.     This effort was similar to previous efforts to compile a thorough report that supported the thesis of generosity and the appreciative nature. The information compiled and addressed several important fundamental aspects of life.    The three studies showed that all indications of a grateful disposition is social desirable. The data that was used contained self reports examined and how it ranked. Next, the disposition was calculated from life’s satisfaction of vitality, happiness, hope, and optimism.  The response were then empirically calculated. Third step was determining the lower order traits that contained the emotions pertaining to well being, willingness, and spirituality aspects that pertain to life and the coping mechanisms that can disable the ability to consciously be thankful and helpful. The last steps involved bringing the personality traits that are determined by the Big Five and the common association that are in sync or are agreeable. Results     The results of previous efforts and the most recent data provided support the thesis. The measures of affectivity and life satisfaction in all areas that were tested are conducted to determine the next course of action for testing and retesting as for accuracy. The information that is issued and used to understand the importance of life satisfactions, vitality, subjective happiness, optimism, and hope. It is to understand these simple concepts that the affectivity and life satisfaction was determined with positive and negative affects that would influence the psychological symptoms. This includes the variable that resulted in understanding prosociality. The disposition with empathy and social desirability were used to validate the believe that the spirituality and religiousness would have supported any concept of what and why people are appreciative.     The results of the first study that involved the information gathered from the Big Five assessment and variable ranking scale of a certain â€Å"idea†or ideal. The analysis that was used to calculate the self report and the measure of affectivity and life situation with the greatest weight. This was closely supported by the remaining questions and their assessment as it was placed through the structural equation model. The statistical equation determined the validity of each section as it is compared. A t-test was conducted to determine whether or not there are social sizes difference in satification with life for people with optimism, and conscientiousness. The results those showed that smaller social network size (mean=4.10) were significantly less satisfied compared to those with life larger social network size (mean=5.05; t(89)= -3.79, p.001). The result showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the Satisfaction with life and the Optimism (r=.54, p.001), there was a strong positive correlation between conscientiousness and satification with life (r=.22, p.04).     The effect on an individual’s answer is the influenced by their interaction in certain situations. The factor that are used to determine the type of person that is in a situation that are agreeable, conscientious, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness. The types of individuals that one associates with fall into four categories – friend, relative, romantic partners, and coworker.     The results of a variable of 39 questions statistically check and recheck so that the validity would be accurate.  When determining the optimism of how the â€Å"Big Five†personality effectors are involved. It was used to the one factor system of gratitude and vitality. Using the two factor solution fit better as the correlation factors were at r=.46, p
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment