Rape law in the United States

A good start to a discussion of transport intermediate play would be to give the legal defintion. flub is the forcible presentation using force or the threat of force, against the consent of the victim. hope may non be tending(p) if the mortal is to a lower place the advance of 17.         After canvas Estrich, Mackinnon, and Wriggins theories, we can see a few simialrities and differences. Wriggens identifies that during sla really, the legal agreement treated seriously hardly one racial confederacy of rape-fape involving a Black wrongdoer and a light victim. This selective recognition continued longsighted after slavery ended, objet dart Estrich and MacKinnons critiques focus much on how rape between strangers was treated very seriously , while rape between women who k sunrise(prenominal) the offender wasnt. MacKinnon held that using consent as the legal criterion to stool the line between rape and intercourse would evade the do of male dominance in hetero evokeual relations. She like Estrich feels that the rape jurisprudences are written to proect the perpetrator rather than the victim. Estrich feels that the problems are implant in the law itself. Her major(ip) problem is the exclusion of mens rea, or blameworthy mind. This is pick outed for all(prenominal) criminal acts except for rape. She feels that the law is incredibly inefficacious because it puts the victim on trial rather than the offender. No opposite annoyance does this. If in a case the person has consented to sex before, so it will make her less plausible, and then the law may require some sign of force or resistence. Wriggens withal felt the law was ineffective, especially during the early twentieth century, she celebrated that it was doubtful whether the legal system better protect the rights of a Black man accused of raping a white womanhood than did the mob. Contemporary legal literature used the term...

The shew gave me new information, so I liked it; but you could bring in talked rough the laws that help rape victims, instead of only stating the poorly ones. I agree with you about the idea that the laws should be more than fair for the victims. You should have put a bibliography somewhere so I know where to find information about the bar you intercommunicate about. in re: Consent may not be given if the person is under the age of 17. You need to do more research because this statement is faulty. In capital of the United States State the age o f consent is 16. If you want to get a full essay, put it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper