Political Science

(1 )Gay RightsIt is classical to distinguish fairylike mightys from the issue of gay conjugal nub . Gays enjoy all the same rights as every demote American , but in that respect is no right to founder a nuptials recognise by the articulate . This is an important distinction gay rights would apply is gays were deprived of some(prenominal) of their inbuilt rights , but marriage is not a built-in rightBecause of this inequality , it is intellectually dish mavinst to draw an analogy among the gay marriage issue and the civil rights movement of the 1950 s and 1960 s or the women s voter turnout movement . In those cases American citizens were demanding light for their constitutional rights . uniting is not a constitutional rightThat existence said , thither is no cause argument to proscribe gay sight from marrying . The bring up does brook an interest in promoting marriage which is why wed couples receive tax incentives . spousal is promoted because married couples foreman to a greater extent answerable and stable homes than non-married couples . Also , marriage is recognized as the outperform atmosphere in which to raise childrenMany present that the point of marriage is to have children and that since gays can not have children of their own , they should not swallow married . This argument fails , in time , because there is no fertility test of heterosexual married couples the state recognizes the marriages of couples who are too old to have childrenA normal convention for governing should be that the government should not scrap adept way or another unless there is a shit need for such action There is no compelling argument to be made for the government to set up marriage in this way , other than to ensure that a person can only be married to whiz other person at a time and that two partners must be a! dults . After those conditions are met , the state should , kinda frankly , mind its own business (2 )Hillary s Baby BondIt is cockamamy to argue that this proposal by Mrs .

Clinton would involve spending near as ir answerable as the spending on the champion That being said , this is an unsustainable proposal . The majority of spending by the federal government goes to entitlement course of instructions especially Social Security and Medicare / Medicaid . The surface of these programs is commendable they aim to guarantee a basic peripheral of security to all Americans , regardless of their heartThere is a fundamental disconnect , however , in how liberals such as Hillary Clinton view the theatrical performance role of government . Her proposal on the baby stick with means that she believes one of two things . Either the government s business is to spread wealth from the rich to the poor , or the government is more responsible with peoples money than the people themselves , or both(prenominal) of the aboveThis is clear a redistribution scheme , since if all households had the 5000 already , the program would be unnecessary . More troubling however , it implies , fairish as Social Security does , that the government is more responsible than the people . There is no such thing as...If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper